Showing posts with label boomers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label boomers. Show all posts

Sunday, November 11, 2018

Anti-White Racism is the Only Issue

This piece in American Thinker has been making the Twitter rounds, and when you read it you'll immediately understand why. It is profoundly edgy for a mainstream outfit, which backs up what I've been saying recently: in five years or so, nationalism will no longer be the unsavory fringe position. It will be the default position for right-of-center whites across the globe.

Mark Point writes:

By the 1990s the entire constellation of Christian morality and civic responsibility in the public space had been secularized and compressed into a singular mandate. Millennials were taught from childhood that the highest moral good was serving the self-esteem of non-whites. In prior ages virtues such as courage, modesty, chivalry, valor and faith were ways young adults were encouraged to distinguish themselves but for Millennials it was an adeptness and willingness to navigate the mercurial minefield of knowing when and how to serve the self-esteem of non-whites that mattered.

Spot on. I have the benefit -- if you can call it that -- of having been a college student fairly recently. I was a "non-traditional" college student, a polite euphemism for "unusually old." Spending a few years back at university in my 30s gave me an intimate look at what passes for education. I'll tell you this: millennials aren't dreaming up their ridiculous beliefs on their own. They're being taught this stuff, and they're being affirmed and praised when they regurgitate it properly. I've seen it up close.

He goes on:

Over the past thirty years conservatives were busy building an entire culture around anti-socialism while the Left was busy pushing its cultural trojan horse to unleash a whole different kind of plague. Maybe deep down many conservatives knew the anti-white damn would burst but they were too cowardly to confront it. Don't believe me? Railing against socialism won't get you fired from Google but notice the toxic way in which "diversity" is being used against white and you'll be untouchable. 

This is what bothers me about the alt-light, let alone boomers, on YouTube: your new video about how silly socialism is or how crazy feminists are is entirely missing the only point that currently matters, which is that white people are the singular target of the political left. Socialism, feminism, and Islam will be some of the various tunes the victors will dance to when it's finally time to frolic upon our graves. First thing's first, though: eradicate whites. That is the prime directive across the globe. Our own extinction has been sold to us using gentle terms like diversity and inclusion. We've been taught to find it lovable, to cock our heads to the side and say "aww" when a white mommy and black daddy coo at their mixed race toddler in a cereal commercial. We've even been trained to suppress our natural defensive instincts as racist, that most sinful of '-ists.

Don't expect the Japanese or Chinese to do anything but look in amazement and take notes as Ford F150 ten-gallon hat types indignantly yell "out of my cold dead hands!" meanwhile their grand daughter is likely to spend the same twilight years in a very dangerous world because her grandfather was too worried about his bumpstock or the return of Fidel Castro to take a stand against the toppling of his ancestors and the deracination of his heirs. 

There is only one issue left, and it's not the Second Amendment or abortion or the economy. It's the survival of the people whose ancestors built this country. A nation is a people, not an economic zone. America is Americans, and we can't make America great again if America doesn't exist.

Friday, November 9, 2018

Civic Nationalism Is Dying a Slow Painful Ugly Death

I'm back on Twitter and it's just embarrassing.




It's as if American "liberals" and "conservatives" are in a contest to see who can be more egalitarian and globalist -- in other words, more leftist -- and the conservatives are just determined to pull ahead. 

Candace Owens (the less said about her the better) has not mentioned the abject failure of #BLEXIT in her Twitter feed despite multiple tweets @ her showing that bar graph everyone has seen by now that breaks down votes per party by gender and race. Of course 90% of blacks voted Democrat. Of course in many races where the candidate was black they voted Democrat at 95% and up. Blacks and Hispanics vote by tribal affiliation. Whites are the only people who don't, at least not to that extent. If we were smart we would, but cold weather made us evolve big smart brains and come up with ideas like individualism and egalitarianism and now we can't help but fuck ourselves over. 

There is absolutely nothing we can do that is going to make black and Hispanic voters go to the polls and vote for ideas. It is simply not going to happen. And we can't win them over by being nice. This country cannot possibly give them anything more than we already have. The pandering is utterly futile and honest blacks just roll their eyes at #BLEXIT. 

I saw a Gavin McInnes video where he's talking to Alex Jones about what a huge awesome deal Blexit is, and he says something like, "Oh there were HUNDREDS of black people gathered there. It was huge!" Hundreds. I got embarrassed for him watching that video. I get embarrassed every time he talks about race because it's like he's forcing himself to be naive. He repeats the same tired talking points over and over -- I'm a libertarian so I don't have to think about race! I believe in a meritocracy -- and it reminds me of Stephen Colbert back when he was playing a cringey boomer on The Colbert Report saying, "I can't see race. I'm color blind." 

Deep down, I think the alt-lighters like Gavin and even some of the Boomers like James Woods see what's actually happening -- how could they not? bar graphs are super easy to read -- but they just can't let themselves swim out past where their feet can touch. It's too scary to dive into the deep end, and I get why. It's disconcerting and faintly awful to be called out as a racist. 

At first. Then you sort of get used to it. Then you sort of don't care. And then you decide that it's just a word, and it's a word that has purposely been imbued with power. All your life you've been conditioned to believe that word contains all the evil in the universe. And then you ask yourself why that is.

I would like things to be other than they are. I would enjoy joining hands with people of all colors and frolicking upon a hillside in the morning dew. But reality is reality, facts are facts, and there will never be a #BLEXIT from the Democrat party. The longer we wait to accept this, the closer we get to being a minority in the countries our forefathers built and died for.

In 10 years or so nationalism will be an extremely mainstream position for white people in America, and by then it will probably be late to affect any change democratically. Maybe not in 2020, but pretty damn soon, we will be unable to elect a Republican president because there won't be enough white people to vote Republican. Then we'll have to pull a #WHEXIT, and white people interested in taking the country back will have to split from the GOP and form a white identitarian party. By then the Deep South will be South Africa and the Southwest will be Mexico and white people will be cowering in Montana, Idaho, Utah, Kentucky, etc., stroking their AR-15s and wishing they had listened to those creepy "Nazis" instead of Laura Ingraham.

Wednesday, October 31, 2018

Humility, Honesty

I'm not a philosopher, a scholar, or an intellectual. This blog is only useful insofar as it is instructive to observe the details of a regular person trying to think through vitally important issues. I've often wished I could find a blog like that: not a great big genius lecturing about things but someone trying to figure out the same things I'm trying to figure out. If you're trying to figure out race realism, the far right, traditionalism, monarchism, orthodox Christianity, and any topics related to these, perhaps this blog will be of help to you.

I'm vowing here and now to be completely honest. Brutally so. I don't have anything to hide. Every embarrassing belief I've ever held will be laid bare for examination. It will keep me humble, and who doesn't need that.

Like many on the far right I arrived here after walking a long path from a sort of default public-school leftism. If you go to public school in a major American city, and you don't have a strong right-wing counterinfluence in the home, you will graduate a default leftist.

Becoming pro-life very suddenly (and against my will) in my late 20s was the fulcrum, the point at which I pivoted out of leftism. The feeling of being wrong about something, of discovering that I wasn't merely thinking about something wrong but that I held a belief without ever thinking about it at all -- discovering that was exhilarating. It was also terrifying. Humbling. It led to a somewhat traumatic identity crisis, but I also wanted more of it. I couldn't help but examine all my beliefs to see if I was wrong about them, and lo and behold I was.

A year later I wasn't an agnostic anymore, but a Roman Catholic. And a few years after that Obamacare happened and I watched it go down and then I couldn't be a Democrat anymore. And then I started flirting with the idea of being a conservative. It had always been a dirty word to me, synonymous with mean white men and dumb housewives and country music singers and just everything distasteful. Flirting with it was scary but fun. I read Ann Coulter first. I forget why. Maybe because, having read not a single word she'd ever written, I loathed her completely when I was a leftist. I'm glad I picked her to begin with. because she was funny and logical and unapologetic and mean. I loved her style. She hooked me in. Eventually I familiarized myself with the typical neo-con talking points and read a lot of their books: Shapiro, D'Souza, Ponnuru, Limbaugh. Some of them were too cheesy Boomer-clueless for me (Hannity, Ingraham, Levin). Some of those early encounters I still think have kernels of truth in them. I'm thinking in particular of David Mamet's quite astonishing book The Secret Knowledge: On the Dismantling of American Culture.

So I was a neocon for a while. I still called myself a feminist, but I considered myself a dissident feminist who was going to save feminism from itself, make it virtuous and moral. It's laughable now, but to be fair this was in 2010 and it sounds funny but that was a lifetime ago when it comes to the dominant culture in this country. My friend and I actually filmed a comedy sketch on YouTube in which we wore blackface (really well I might add; we looked and sounded black; the makeup took 3 hours to apply) and I shared it on Facebook in 2008 and people laughed. No one reported me. I didn't get banned from anything. It only got shared by a few people who thought it was funny. Granted, I was not yet a fairly well-known activist, but it truly was a different time.

Like many people do, I moved on to libertarianism and then to anarchism and there I dwelt for some time. Maybe a couple years? I read the Austrian economists and watched a lot of Stefan Molyneux videos from back when he was still a hard core anarchist. He has since changed his tune on a lot of things. ("There are no libertarians in foxholes." -- Milo) I consumed more than my fair share of Reason and Taki Mag articles. I had a lot of quibbles with libertarianism and anarchism and in time they grew too big to ignore. The main one was immigration. At my state libertarian convention (sooo many speeches about pot) there was a speaker who posited that immigration was actually a net positive for the country by any metric -- "It's a free market in labor!" -- and I stood up to challenge her. She promised to send me some references but of course she didn't.

Over time I read too much Chesterton and began exploring the concept of monarchy. This was also exhilarating to contemplate because I'm an American and we are indoctrinated to believe monarchy is synonymous with tyranny. Exploring monarchy led me inevitably to the Dark Enlightenment, Mencius Moldbug, Nick Land, and other neoreactionary thinkers. According to an infographic I've seen, most people touch down at the radical right before they move to traditionalism as their final destination but for me it was sort of the opposite. I do think the alt-right, or perhaps to be more specific race realism, goes hand in hand with traditionalism and neoreaction. I have much more to say on this topic but that's good enough for now.

Over time I have changed my mind about a good number of things but it wasn't so much flip-flopping as just continuing to learn. My trajectory has always been further right, because I have always been after the truth. There's a theory of personality called the Enneagram and like most personality theories it's most likely bollocks but according to my test results my type is called "The Truth Teller," and when I read that descriptor it felt alarmingly accurate. I say things that are true, or that I believe are true, and it has gotten me into serious trouble. I mean, it's why I'm here blogging anonymously at no one, gone from social media and contemplating moving to another state and changing my name so my kids can have a normal life. I don't know how to not say things that are true. Sometimes it hurts my personal relationships as well. I can be too blunt, too harsh, too critical.

So that is the one thing I can promise anyone who reads this: I won't lie. I won't make shit up. And because of that I'll routinely look like a fool and remain humble.